On Air Now
John DePetro
John DePetro
1:00pm - 5:00pm
The John DePetro Show
Contact Me
My Blog
Infinite Menus, Copyright 2006, OpenCube Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Have a swingin' good time, Sundays from 10-11 on Sunday Swing Time with Bobb Angel
Frank Prosnitz. Every Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday on, The Open Forum
Politics News
Subscribe To This Feed

ABC News(WASHINGTON) -- House Oversight Committee leaders said Tuesday that newly provided classified documents show that President Trump's former national security adviser, Mike Flynn, may have broken the law when he failed to seek U.S. government permission or to disclose his acceptance of payments from a media organization considered to be an arm of the Russian government.

Republican chairman Jason Chaffetz of Utah and the panel's top Democrat, Elijah Cummings of Maryland spoke to reporters after reviewing classified documents from the Defense Intelligence Agency in a secure area of the Capitol's basement.

"As a former military officer, you simply cannot take money from Russia, Turkey, or anybody else, and it appears as if he did take that money," Chaffetz said of Flynn. "It was inappropriate. And there are repercussions for the violation of law," the Republican representative added.

Cummings said someone convicted of such a violation could face a punishment that included "fines and five years imprisonment."

The Oversight Committee has been investigating whether Flynn, a retired Army lieutenant general, properly disclosed foreign payments he received for work overseas, including a speech in late 2015 to Russia's state-owned TV network Russia Today for which he which he received over $33,000.

Flynn directed the federal Defense Intelligence Agency until he was pushed out by the Obama administration, and at the time of the RT speech he continued to hold a top-level security clearance.

A spokesman for Flynn told ABC News at the time that the money from the RT appearance was from his speakers bureau, and that Flynn reported the contacts to the Defense Intelligence Agency.

In March, Chairman Jason Chaffetz and Cummings requested documents from the Pentagon, White House, FBI and Director of National Intelligence regarding Flynn’s contacts with foreign nationals and any funds he received from foreign sources.

Trump fired Flynn early in his term as national security adviser for allegedly misleading Vice President Mike Pence about his contacts with Russian officials.

Flynn was paid nearly $60,000 in 2015 by three Russian firms affiliated with the Kremlin, including RT, according to documents released by Democrats on the Oversight Committee.

Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

0
comments



Subscribe To This Feed

Al Bello/Getty Images(HOUSTON) -- Former President George H.W. Bush remains hospitalized this week after he was diagnosed with pneumonia earlier this month.

Bush, 92, is currently being held for "a few more days of observation," according to his spokesman Jim McGrath.

"President George H.W. Bush continues to be in good spirits and is resting comfortably at Houston Methodist Hospital," McGrath said in a statement yesterday. The former president is expected to be released by the end of the week.

This marks the third hospital stay for Bush this year. In January, he was hospitalized for 12 days after contracting pneumonia. He recovered enough to toss the coin for the Super Bowl held in Houston, Texas, Feb. 5. However, the former president was again hospitalized after the event, for yet-to-be-named reasons, which was not disclosed at the time.

Last week, Bush's staff announced he had been hospitalized again "for observation due to a persistent cough that prevented him from getting proper rest. It was subsequently determined he had a mild case of pneumonia, which was treated and has been resolved."

Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

0
comments



Subscribe To This Feed

Wavebreakmedia Ltd/iStock/Thinkstock(WASHINGTON) -- Just shy of his 100th day in office, President Donald Trump -- the first U.S. president with no political, military, or foreign policy experience -- has shaken up the globe, surprising allies with his demands, adversaries with his military action, and maybe even himself with his new power.

During his short time in office, Trump has had to make decisions about life and death, war and peace, and military and diplomacy, as his administration exerts itself on the world stage. Here are the top foreign policy moments of his first 100 days.

Surprise strikes on Syria

The “America First” president shocked the world with his muscular response to the use of chemical weapons in Syria. Just days after the Syrian regime of Bashar al Assad reportedly bombed the town Khan Sheikhoun with sarin gas, Trump ordered 59 Tomahawk strikes on the air base where Assad’s planes are said to have taken off.

"I now have responsibility, and I will have that responsibility and carry it very proudly," he said at a Rose Garden press conference with Jordan's King Abdullah.

Critics on the left and right were surprised that the businessman who had decried years of wasteful spending on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan was ready to play the world’s policeman. But allies, from the UK to Israel, applauded the response, even as Russia and Iran blasted the U.S. for the attack on their ally Assad.

The administration has left the door open to more strikes against Assad for further violations of international laws and norms -- although it has faced some confusion on its views of Assad’s future and its priorities in Syria.

High-stakes diplomacy with China

If Syria was the moment of crisis for Trump, China has been the steady challenge.

Candidate Trump bashed China constantly, citing the country as a source of America’s problems, often with graphic language. They were manipulating their currency, stealing American jobs, beating the U.S. on trade, even raping the American economy.

But now that he’s in office, Trump has taken a more nuanced tone, culminating in a two-day summit at his private club Mar-a-Lago with Chinese President Xi Jinping. He agreed to abide by the one-China policy, to not label China a currency manipulator, and so far, to not slap them with the sort of tariff that critics said would start a trade war.

Instead, Trump appears to be using that tough economic talk as leverage to get China to help with North Korea. Since the summit, Trump and Xi have spoken twice by phone, and China may be pressuring its ally and neighbor North Korea a bit more.

This is an important space to watch, though, as the stakes in North Korea rise or the domestic politics in China change.

Boiling tensions with North Korea

Key to that is what happens next in North Korea, where every day the rhetoric seems to heat up. North Korea has been pursuing a nuclear missile capable of reaching the continental United States for years, but it just could happen under Trump’s watch.

On a critical trip to Japan, South Korea, and China, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said that all options are on the table and that the time for “strategic patience” is over. And the President said the U.S. would send a strike group and a nuclear submarine to the area, although it took some time before the USS Carl Vinson and company actually headed toward those waters.

Now, the world anxiously awaits what that means if North Korea successfully tests an intercontinental ballistic missile or another nuclear bomb. If Trump strikes preemptively, will it mean all-out war on the Korean peninsula, as strongman Kim Jong-un has promised?

So far, the administration is pursuing diplomatic and economic options in the face of those fiery words and after the Kim regime detained a third American citizen. The pressure on China to do more is working, they say, and this week both Trump and Tillerson will speak to the United Nations Security Council, to push full implementation of existing UN sanctions.

But even then, it’s unclear how far China is willing to go on North Korea, since it fears destabilizing or toppling the regime. Trump and Kim’s next moves are treading on a fine line here, as the world holds its breath.

The Russian question

For months now, the Trump administration has been dogged by questions about ties between his advisers and the Russian government. Those questions still loom, as the FBI and two Congressional committees investigate.

It’s created a dilemma for the real estate magnate who promised to “get along” with Russia and work on what he saw as common issues, including terrorism. Complicating that campaign promise are the politics of working with the country that reportedly hacked his political opponent to favor him and the reality on the ground in places like Syria, where Russian President Vladimir Putin has labeled as terrorists and even targeted American-backed rebels.

That tension came to a head with Tillerson’s big visit to Moscow, meeting with Putin and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. Initially announced at the same time that the State Department said Tillerson would skip a NATO summit, critics were quick to pounce that the Trump administration was insulting European allies in favor of Russia.

At those meetings, Tillerson and Lavrov commented that U.S.-Russian relations were at their lowest point yet. They tried to paper over major differences on Syria and promised to take steps to work together down the line -- although no tangible changes have been announced so far.

Accelerating the fight against terrorism

The most apparent change in U.S. foreign policy may be what Trump has done to the military, pushing for a more robust, muscular presence to take on terror groups around the world.

The administration granted new capabilities to commanders in Yemen and Somalia, allowing them to conduct more airstrikes without individual White House approval. They returned strike authority to battlefield commanders in Iraq and Syria. And the military dropped the world’s largest, non-nuclear bomb on an ISIS cave complex in Afghanistan.

But the increased activity has created more risks, too. Early into his administration, a controversial raid in Yemen killed several civilians and a U.S. Navy SEAL. U.S. airstrikes in Mosul, Iraq, and Al Jinah, Syria, may have killed hundreds of civilians. The military is still investigating those claim but it did reveal that it accidentally bombed a U.S.-backed Syrian rebel position, killing 18 allied fighters.

In its fight against terror, the Trump administration has also targeted what it sees as the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism -- Iran. While it reviews its Iran policy writ large, especially whether it will abide by the nuclear agreement, it has blasted Iran for its support for terrorists in Syria, Yemen, and Iraq; for harassing U.S. ships in international waters in the Persian Gulf; and for its missile tests and its continued pursuit of a nuclear bomb, according to Tillerson. That review should conclude in mid-July.

Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

0
comments



Subscribe To This Feed

ABC News(WASHINGTON) -- The White House continues to send mixed signals over whether it will draw a hard line on requiring that funding for a border wall be included in any spending bill that hits the president's desk.

President Trump signaled to a gathering of conservative media on Monday that he may be open to a delay in funding for his proposed border wall.

The president said, according to tweets from conservative media at the gathering this evening, that his administration could get the funding for the wall this week or could come back to it in September.

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) quickly seized on the remarks in an off-camera response Monday evening, saying it's good for the country that the president is taking the wall off the table in negotiations with Congress over government funding.

“It's good for the country that President Trump is taking the wall off the table in these negotiations. Now the bipartisan and bicameral negotiators can continue working on the outstanding issues," Schumer said in a statement.

But when asked by ABC News on Tuesday morning, White House press secretary Sean Spicer said the president has not given up on getting funding for the wall now. He said funding for the border wall remains a White House priority for both the fiscal year 2017 and 2018 spending bills.

Democrats in Congress have vowed to block the passage of a last-minute appropriations bill if it includes funding for the wall.

Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

0
comments



Subscribe To This Feed

Joe Raedle/Getty Images(WASHINGTON) -- The State Department is facing criticism for a blog post that details the history of Mar-a-Lago, President Donald Trump's Florida estate.

The post titled "Mar-a-Lago: The Winter White House" was originally published on April 4 by ShareAmerica, a blog run by the State Department's Bureau of International Information Programs, which works to create content that promotes America with embassies and consulates around the world.

The State Department denied that it was promoting Trump's private club, saying in a statement, "The intention of the article was to inform the public about where the president has been hosting world leaders. We regret any misperception and have removed the post."

The post, which was also featured on the website for U.S. Embassy in the U.K., portrays Mar-a-Lago as a "dreams-come-true" story for the property's original builder, socialite and heiress Marjorie Merriweather Post.

Post, who willed the estate to the U.S. government upon her death in 1973, wanted her property to one day be used "as a winter White House for the U.S. president to entertain visiting foreign dignitaries," according to the blog post.

However, the blog post outlines that her plan didn't work as Presidents Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter never used the property, and it was eventually sold back to the Post Foundation in 1981 due to its expensive maintenance cost.

In 1985, Trump purchased the property and 10 years later introduced it to the public as the Mar-a-Lago Club.

Since Trump became commander-in-chief, the blog post says, Post's presidential dreams have come true with Trump regularly working out of the house and using the club in February to host Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his wife, Akie.

When news of the blog post made its way to Twitter Monday, several politicians took to social media to express their concerns over the use of taxpayer dollars and the promotion of Trump's personal property.

 

As the WH plans deep cuts to hunger programs and foreign aid, so nice to see taxpayer money being used responsibly...to promote Mar-a-Lago. pic.twitter.com/tuTpjaYyLu

— Mark Takano (@RepMarkTakano) April 24, 2017

 

 

Yes, I am curious @StateDept. Why are taxpayer $$ promoting the President's private country club? pic.twitter.com/IlPhUlvMwa

— Ron Wyden (@RonWyden) April 24, 2017



A few minutes later, Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, posted a link to the post saying, "Here is the full post in its kleptocratic glory."

Richard Painter, who was the chief White House ethics lawyer for former President George W. Bush from 2005 to 2007, tweeted a link to the post with the caption, "Use of public office for private gain pure and simple."

 

Use of public office for private gain pure and simplehttps://t.co/V1naBvE6jt

— Richard W. Painter (@RWPUSA) April 24, 2017

 

Former President Barack Obama's chief ethics attorney, Norm Eisen, also commented on the issue when asked about what could be done.

you can sue to shut down trump's exploitation of government $$$ and benefits for his personal gain--and we have! https://t.co/u5z4thhyCX https://t.co/PN3Ih4CVWp

— Norm Eisen (@NormEisen) April 24, 2017

A White House official said the White House was not aware of the Mar-a-Lago post and found out about its existence through the media.

The post remains on the website for the U.S. Embassy in the U.K., but has been deleted from ShareAmerica's website and replaced with the State Department's statement.

Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

0
comments



Subscribe To This Feed

ABC News(WASHINGTON) -- White House press secretary Sean Spicer defended the president's record less than a week before the benchmark of the administration's first 100 days in office.

"When you look at the totality of what we've accomplished ... it is unbelievable what he has been able to do," Spicer said at Monday's press briefing.

He bristled at questions specifically asking whether the president would consider inaction or stalled action on issues that were regular parts of his campaign speeches a failure, including the promise to repeal and replace Obamacare.

Spicer said "you can cherry pick" issues "to look and pick out two or three things" that were not completely addressed during the first 100 days but argued that it would be an inaccurate picture of the administration's work.

"It's easy to nitpick," Spicer said.

"I don't think there's any question that the president has done a significant amount on the issues that he put forward in the campaign," he said, citing how Trump has signed "a record number" of executive orders.

"We are very proud and the president is very proud of what he's been able to accomplish in the first 100 days ... but we also want to start talking about the next 100 days," Spicer said.

Spicer also said that while he "can't guarantee" a government shutdown will be avoided, he doesn't think it's going to happen.

"I can't guarantee," Spicer said of ongoing budget negotiations. "But I think that the work that [Office of Management and Budget] Director [Mick] Mulvaney and others have made in this front and negotiations have been very positive. They feel very confident that won't happen.

"We feel very confident that the government is not going to shut down," he said.

 

.@PressSec tells @jonkarl he's "confident" there won't be a government shutdown, but "can't guarantee" it. https://t.co/HhAaTPXHds pic.twitter.com/BwzxSRAbyc

— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) April 24, 2017

 

Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

0
comments



Subscribe To This Feed

ABCNews.com(NEW YORK) -- With President Donald Trump nearing 100 days in office -- and 96 percent of voters who picked him in November saying they'd do it again today -- ABC News' David Muir traveled to counties in three battleground states to see how residents would grade the commander-in-chief.

Muir, the anchor of "World News Tonight," spoke with voters in the battleground states of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin; just 77,000 votes in those three states decided the election. Muir went to counties where the difference in the vote between Trump and Hillary Clinton was 1 percent or less.

In Michigan's Saginaw County, just two hours north of Detroit, the difference in votes was just 1 percent between the two candidates.

Marianne Bird, who voted for Trump in November, said that she'd give the president a B-minus and that she wanted to see compromise in Washington, D.C.

"I think he can't do everything on his own," said Bird, a teacher who also works the register at Fuzzy's Diner in Saginaw. "The stonewalling isn't helping somebody like me. It might help people on the East Coast and the West Coast, but it's not helping people in the middle -- and I think it's the people in the middle that voted Trump in."

The election is over, she said.

"They have to do something about health care. You have to do something about jobs. … At least, give the guy a chance. That doesn't mean you forget but we have to forgive and we have to move on," Bird said.

Poitiea Price, a Marine veteran, and fiancee Tranica McClendon, however, said they'd both give Trump a D-minus.

"We don't hear anything from him. ... He's not really answering the questions," Price said.

"You talk about draining the swamp? And you can just look at this guy's Cabinet and tell that he loves the swamp. He loves it," he said.

Meanwhile, in Monroe County, Pennsylvania, Clinton took the county by only 532 votes.

Frank Roggeman, a Vietnam veteran who voted for Trump, said he was a little disappointed in the current administration.

"They couldn't get the health care bill through. And he's having all kinds of problems with the Democrats so it's a little disappointing. I don't blame him," he said.

He said that Trump was trying to keep the promises he'd made to voters during his campaign but that it'd be a "rocky road" if he was unable to do so.

"He hasn't built ... the wall yet. I know he's working on that and he's going back to the health care again and tax reform. So I mean he's trying but I don't know whether he has the political capital to get it done," Roggeman said.

And Debbie Strangio, a Navy veteran, said she'd give Trump an F.

"If I could give a lower grade, I would," she told Muir. "I think he's every embarrassing when he talks to foreign leaders. He doesn't sound like he has a vocabulary more than a third-grader."

Trump's foreign policy moves and his vocal impasse with North Korea concerned Strangio, a garden nursery manager.

"He's never made it a secret that he would use nuclear bombs and that scares me. I personally think by the time it's done we're going to be in a World War III," she said.

Retired construction worker Rich Buda, also a Marine, said he'd give Trump an A-plus.

"He told us what he's going to do and he's been doing it," Buda told Muir.

Back in the Midwest, in Wisconsin's Sauk County, the vote was also razor thin. Trump won by a mere 109 votes.

At a park in Bonnaroo, the county's largest city, Marlene Buchanan, a grandmother, said she worried about her disabled son and her country.

"I am very uncomfortable with Donald Trump," said Buchanan, a Clinton supporter. "He has done some things that I don't agree with and he has also placed people in positions who I feel are definitely not qualified for the roles that they have in his administration."

Buchanan said she'd give the president an F.

But Eric Grunewald, a Trump supporter, said that in his opinion, the president had sort of "hit home" with gun rights and other issues.

"If I had to give the Trump administration a grade, it would probably be a B, B-plus but it's still too early to tell," Grunewald said. "Compared to the Obama administration, I think he's willing to make harsher decisions and do things that the Obama administration was afraid to do."

Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

0
comments



Subscribe To This Feed

ABCNews.com(CHICAGO) -- Former President Obama on Monday offered a preview of what his "next job" might be during his first public remarks since leaving office, with no mention of his White House successor.

"So, what's been going on while I've been gone?" he joked at the start of a panel discussion.

Obama, who had taken some vacation time after handing the White House keys to President Trump, made his return to the public stage at the University of Chicago, where he taught constitutional law for years.

While there are a number of issues he cares about, Obama said, he hopes to help inspire the younger generation to get more involved in civic engagement.

"On the back end of my presidency, now that it's completed, I'm spending a lot of time thinking about what is the most important thing I can do for my next job?" said Obama, who was joined by six young adults from schools in the Chicago area.

Obama, 55, added: "The single most important thing I can do is to help in any way I can prepare the next generation of leadership to take up the baton and to take their own crack at changing the world."

The former president didn't mention his successor once during the discussion, but he did comment on the polarizing political climate.

"Because of changes in the media, we now have a situation in which everybody's listening to people who already agree with them and are further and further reinforcing their own realities to the neglect of a common reality that allows us to have a healthy debate and then try to find common ground and actually move solutions forward," Obama said.

"I think a lot of us who have been in politics for a while do see a change from 20 years ago, certainly 30 years ago, where it used to be everybody kind of had the same information. And we had different opinions about it, but there were a common baseline of facts," Obama said.

He added: “If you're liberal, then you're on MSNBC and conservative, you're on Fox News. You're reading The Wall Street Journal or you're reading The New York Times, or whatever your choices are.”

"Or maybe you're just looking at cat videos, which is fine," Obama joked.

Obama also said he hopes that his foundation and presidential center, which is set to be built in the Windy City, will create more "pathways for young people getting involved" and "so that when somebody like me 35 years ago decides I have got something to contribute that we will have eased the path for them."

"Maybe they will learn from the mistakes I and others have made so that they can seize the future," Obama said.

The Democratic president, who was a U.S. senator from Illinois before winning the presidency in 2008 and a second term in 2012, also teased the latest book on which he’s working while reflecting on the value of failure in a political career.

"I'm writing a book about my political journey and as I was writing, I thought about that race," Obama said of his loss to Rep. Bobby Rush in a 2001 Congressional race in Illinois.

Obama, who was critical of President Trump during the election and as of late has had to watch key legislation and regulations he passed get rolled back, concluded on a positive note.

"I have to say that there is a reason why I am always optimistic even when things look like they are sometimes not going the way I want and it is because of young people like this," Obama said. "It gives you a sense of what is possible for this country."

Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

0
comments



Subscribe To This Feed

ABC News(WASHINGTON) -- In the week that will mark his 100th day in office, President Trump will sign four new executive orders, including one calling for a review of offshore-drilling regulations and another directing a review of national-monument designations on federal lands.

The president also plans to to sign an order establishing an "office of accountability and whistleblower protection" at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

The new office will be charged with helping the Veterans Affairs secretary "discipline or terminate [Veterans Affairs] managers or employees who fail to carry out their duties in helping our veterans," according to a White House official.

Trump is also expected Tuesday to sign an executive order creating a task force "to examine the concerns of rural America and suggest legislative and regulatory changes to address them," the White House said.

The order on national monuments will direct the Interior Department to review prior monument designations under a more than 100-year-old law that authorizes the president to establish federal lands as national monuments.

And as part of the administration's push to expand offshore drilling, the president on Friday is expected to sign a directive called, America First Energy Executive Order, calling for a review of offshore oil and gas locations and rules.

The four new executive orders will bring Trump's total to 32 in his first 100 days, which the White House says is the highest number by any president since World War II.

Prior to his election, Trump criticized his predecessor's use of executive actions as a way of going around around Congress.

"I don't think he even tries anymore. I think he just signs executive actions," Trump said of then-President Obama in December 2015.

Trump pointed to the U.S. government's system of checks and balances.

"That's the way the system is supposed to work. And then all of a sudden, I hear, 'He tried, he can't do it,' and then, boom, and then another one, boom,” he said.

Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

0
comments



Subscribe To This Feed

ABC News(WASHINGTON) -- Saturday marks the 100th day of Donald Trump's presidency. While Trump has called the symbolic marker a "ridiculous standard," he is nonetheless pulling out all the stops in the final days beforehand.

Among the plans are scheduled executive order signings, speeches and discussions with senators and heads of state. Members of his cabinet will also travel "outside the beltway, spreading the President's message across the country," the White House says.

Here's a breakdown of what Trump and his cabinet has planned for the week:

Monday

President Trump

  • Speaks with NASA Dr. Peggy Whitson, who will break the record for the most cumulative time spent in space for any American astronaut. The White House wrote that the two will speak about "the importance of empowering women to pursue educations and careers in STEM fields."
  • Hosts a working lunch with the ambassadors from the countries on the United Nations Security Council: China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, Bolivia, Egypt, Ethiopia, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Senegal, Sweden, Ukraine and Uruguay.
  • Attends a reception with conservative media, which the White House wrote honors "his commitment to opening up the White House to a more diverse set of media outlets."
  • Has dinner with Republican Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.

Cabinet

  • U.S. Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao visits the Ohio State Transportation Research Center.

Tuesday

President Trump

  • Delivers remarks at the National Holocaust Memorial Museum's National Day of Remembrance.
  • Hosts a roundtable discussion with farmers and signs an executive order "to protect and provide relief for rural America." The White House said this executive order creates a task force to "examine the concerns of rural America and suggest legislative and regulatory changes to address them."
  • Has dinner with Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Cabinet

  • Small Business Administration Administrator Linda McMahon travels to Orlando, Florida for a roundtable with Hispanic business owners.

Wednesday

President Trump

  • Outlines principles for tax reform.

White House team

  • Hosts senators for National Security Council briefing on four principals on North Korea.

Cabinet

  • Dr. Ben Carson, secretary of Housing and Urban Development, will visit Columbus, Ohio for a listening tour on urban housing.

Thursday

President Trump

  • Welcomes the President of Argentina, Mauricio Macri.
  • Signs an executive order that will establish an Office of Accountability and Whistleblower Protection in the Department of Veterans Affairs. The office will "help the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to discipline or terminate VA managers or employees who fail to carry out their duties in helping our veterans" and will "identify barriers to the Secretary's authority to put the well-being of our veterans first," according to a White House official.

Cabinet

  • Secretary of Education Betsy Devos and Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke will be on Capitol Hill meeting with members of Congress.

Friday

President Trump

  • Signs several executive orders on energy, which the White House wrote will "move our country even further toward our goal of energy independence." One of the orders, which the White House is calling the "America First Energy Executive Order," orders a "review of the locations available for off-shore oil and gas exploration and of certain regulations governing off-shore oil and gas exploration."
  • Travels to Atlanta to deliver remarks at the National Rifle Association's Leadership Forum.

Cabinet

  • Secretary of State Rex Tillerson chairs the U.N. Security Council meeting.
  • Sonny Perdue will complete a multi-day trip to Wisconsin. Perdue is expected to be confirmed as Secretary of Agriculture on Monday evening.

Saturday, Trump's 100th day in office

President Trump

  • President Trump will be skipping the White House Correspondent's dinner to "speak straight to the people" about his first 100 days as president during a rally in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
  • Trump is also expected to sign an executive order that directs the Department of the Interior to review monuments designated under the Antiquities Act of 1906, which authorizes the president to declare federal lands to be national monuments and therefore restrict the usage of that land. The White House said this executive order will direct the Interior Department to "suggest legislative changes or modifications to the monument proclamations."
  • The White House also noted that the expected executive order signings this week will bring the number of executive orders signed by Trump up to 32 by Friday, which is "the most executive orders signed by a president since World War Two" in the first 100 days.

Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

0
comments



Subscribe To This Feed

iStock/Thinkstock(WASHINGTON) -- Multiple committee investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 campaign will continue to push forward as Congress returns this week.

Here's where things stand and what to watch for in the next few days:

House Intelligence Committee


Members of the House Intelligence Committee are hoping to get back to work after chairman Devin Nunes withdrew himself from the panel's Russia investigation amid ethics complaints. The panel, whose Russia work is now headed by Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas), announced Friday that it invited FBI Director James Comey and Adm. Mike Rogers to appear for a closed door hearing on May 2. The committee also invited former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan and former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates to testify in an open setting sometime after May 2. Nunes had previously cancelled an open hearing with those three former officials, a move his Democratic counterpart Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) quickly condemned as politically motivated.

WHAT TO WATCH THIS WEEK: Members and committee staff are in the process of reviewing National Security Agency documents at Ft. Meade, Maryland, related to former national security adviser Susan Rice's requests to "unmask" particular Trump campaign officials caught up in surveillance of foreign targets.

Senate Intelligence Committee

The Senate Intelligence Committee is still interviewing analysts involved in the 2016 intelligence community report on Russia’s interference that was ordered up by President Obama. Once they are done with those interviews, which could still take months given the amount of records they’re sifting through, Ranking Member Mark Warner (D-Va.) has said the committee will then receive testimony from top Trump officials who have had contact with Russian officials, including Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner.

“We’ve gotta make sure we have all our information first so we know the appropriate questions to ask,” Warner said.

In terms of timing, Warner said he and Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) may not wrap up their investigation until after the August congressional recess. Warner has also not ruled out interviewing Rice as part of his panel's investigation but has said he has seen no evidence that Rice did anything wrong.

WHAT TO WATCH THIS WEEK: Committee staff are expected to continue their off-site interviews with intelligence analysts. The full committee also has its two weekly closed hearings in which it gets updates on all intelligence matters, and on Wednesday, the committee will hold a hearing into the confirmation of the CIA chief counsel.

House Oversight Committee

Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) has said he wants to investigate potential leaks of classified information to reporters about Russia-Trump contacts as well as investigating Mike Flynn’s business dealings in Russia. The committee is investigating payments President Trump's former national security adviser received from foreign governments and also reviewing security protocol at Mar-a-Lago and various issues regarding the Trump Organization.

WHAT TO WATCH THIS WEEK: The committee has no hearings scheduled on Russia, focusing instead on unrelated issues like “the unintended consequences of the foreign account tax compliance act.” They are also asking the Trump Organization how it plans to donate profits from foreign government payments to the U.S. Treasury, which might involve Russia but only tangentially.

Graham and the Senate Judiciary Committee

Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), the chairman and top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Terrorism, are investigating Russian efforts to influence democratic elections in the U.S. and abroad. They met in early March with FBI director Comey and plan to announce a second hearing date and witness panel in the next few weeks.

WHAT TO WATCH THIS WEEK: We await the committee’s announcement of its upcoming hearing.

Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

0
comments



Subscribe To This Feed

Barbara Kinney for Hillary For America(WASHINGTON) -- Former President Bill Clinton's warnings to speak to swing voters fell upon deaf ears during Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign, according to the authors of Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed Campaign, a new book about purported dysfunction inside the campaign team.

Political journalists Amie Parnes and Jonathan Allen spoke with ABC News’ Political Director Rick Klein and Chief White House Correspondent Jonathan Karl on the newest episode of the Powerhouse Politics podcast about the findings they detailed in their book and the backlash they’re getting from the staffers at the center of it all.

The 2016 Clinton team painted itself as "a joyful campaign," Amie Parnes said. "It actually wasn't."

In the book, the authors describe how the campaign ignored the advice of Clinton's husband, former President Bill Clinton, to reach out to communities that weren't already on board with her policies.

"He thought, these egg heads don't really know politics. They don't understand persuasion," Allen said, adding that he wanted to go to suburban and rural areas where they likely wouldn't win the majority. "He knew there was some power just in showing up."

Allen said that in Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential bid, Bill Clinton was blamed for asserting himself too much in the primary campaign's strategy and ultimately obstructing her chances at the presidency. This time around, he tried to stay behind the scenes "because he didn't want to be blamed for defeating his wife again."

Allen and Parnes also detail in the book the night of the presidential election, when Clinton chose to wait until morning to give a concession speech -- a move many found to be odd.

Allen said she simply "wasn't ready to make that speech." She hadn't reviewed her concession speech, there wasn't a speech location available and some believed there was a possibility that more votes could come in. Her team had also said she wanted to "gather her thoughts."

That night, Parnes and Allen wrote, she apologized to former President Barrack Obama on the phone.

"It's a painful moment for her, she's feeling the weight of that moment," Parnes said.

Several Clinton campaign staffers have since come out in force denying the book's revelations and making jokes about "infighting" along with pictures of happy staffers on Twitter.

"It's hard to read a depiction of the campaign that paints a dedicated, cohesive team as mercenaries with questionable motives," Clinton's deputy communications director Christina Reynolds wrote in a Medium post on Wednesday. "That's just not the campaign, the staff or the candidate I was in the trenches with for 18 months."

Jessie Lehrich, Clinton's foreign policy spokesman, disputed depictions of internal tensions after the election. On Wednesday, he tweeted that "the aftermath of the election was a hug-fest" at Clinton headquarters.

But Parnes said: "We stand by our reporting." She said they talked to more than 100 sources, most of which were inside the campaign and many in the team's top ranks.

Besides, Parnes said, they didn't portray Clinton as a "sinister" person.

"There are actually very sympathetic moments... It's not like we're bashing someone over the head with how bad Hillary Clinton is," Parnes said.

Allen agreed that there are moments in the book that will likely be painful for Democrats to read, but there are also pieces that document bright moments, like when they won a string of states in the primaries.

"There’s a little bit of everything in this book because it's really just documenting what happened," Allen said.

As for what's next for Clinton, Parnes said she expects Americans will see more of her, though she'll likely stay out of the epicenter.

Allen said she may be instrumental in Democratic races going forward, especially for those seeking her most fervent admirers.

"There are some unique aspects of her candidacy and what she means historically that you could see some candidates wanting to go toward her and get an endorsement," Allen said. "I think there are a lot of women who feel like this election exposed misogyny in the electorate. I think there are a lot of women who felt like she was robbed."

Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

0
comments



Subscribe To This Feed

ABC News(WASHINGTON) -- There's no honeymoon for Donald Trump in a new ABC News/Washington Post poll, but also no regrets: He approaches his 100th day in office with the lowest approval rating at this point of any president in polls since 1945 -- yet 96 percent of those who supported him in November say they'd do it again today.

His challenges are considerable. Majorities say Trump lacks the judgment and the temperament it takes to serve effectively. Six in 10 doubt his honesty and trustworthiness, see him as out of touch and don't think he understands the problems of people like them. Fifty-six percent say he hasn't accomplished much in his first 100 days. And 55 percent say he doesn't follow a consistent set of principles in setting policy (though fewer see this as a problem, 48 percent).

All told, 42 percent of Americans approve of Trump's performance as president, while 53 percent disapprove. That compares to an average of 69-19 percent for past presidents at or near 100 days in office -– for example, 69-26 percent for Trump's predecessor, Barack Obama.

Still, the national survey also finds some brighter spots for the president –- chiefly in pushing for jobs and in foreign policy –- as well as deep popularity problems for the opposition party. Sixty-seven percent say the Democratic Party is out of touch with the concerns of most Americans, even more than say the same about Trump, and similar to the Republican Party (62 percent). That's a steeply negative turn for the Democrats, 19 percentage points more critical than when last asked three years ago, including especially steep losses in their own base.

Trump's better grades include broad 73 percent approval of his pressuring companies to keep jobs in the United States –- even most Democrats, liberals and nonwhites approve, three groups that are broadly critical of Trump more generally. And more than half, 53 percent, see him as a strong leader, although that compares with 77 percent for Obama at this stage.

On one specific issue, a plurality, 46 percent, says he's handling the situation with North Korea "about right," as opposed to being too aggressive (37 percent) or too cautious (just 7 percent). Similarly, a recent ABC/Post poll found 51 percent support for Trump's missile strikes on Syria; together these results make his foreign policy a comparative bright spot. They're also a contrast with Obama, seen by 53 percent as too cautious in his foreign policy in fall 2014, as he dealt with Syria and Russian intervention in Ukraine.

As noted, this poll, produced for ABC by Langer Research Associates, finds no evidence of buyer's remorse among Trump supporters. Among those who report having voted for him in November, 96 percent today say it was the right thing to do; a mere 2 percent regret it. And if a rerun of the election were held today, the poll indicates even the possibility of a Trump victory in the popular vote among 2016 voters.

In two break-even results, Americans divide, 44-41 percent, on whether Trump is keeping most of his campaign promises, and likewise divide, 35-35 percent, on whether he's doing a better or worse job than they expected. Views turn negative, as noted, on how much Trump has accomplished in his first three months. Forty-two percent say a great deal or good amount, but 56 percent say not much or nothing.

Again, Obama scored far better on all three of these measures at his 100th day, 60-26 percent on keeping his promises, 54-18 percent on performing better vs. worse than expected and 63-36 percent on his accomplishments.

There are difficulties for Trump in other results, as well. Just 37 percent approve of the major changes in federal spending he's proposed (50 percent disapprove) and only 34 percent approve of his having given his daughter and son-in-law, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, major positions in his administration (61 percent disapprove). (There are only three groups in which more than half approve of these appointments –- Republicans, 69 percent; evangelical white Protestants, 56 percent; and conservatives, 51 percent.) And rejecting Trump's criticisms, the public by 58-36 percent says the federal courts that have blocked his immigration orders are "acting rightly as a check on the president's powers" rather than wrongly interfering with them.

The president does better on another item on which he's been criticized in some quarters –- spending substantial time at commercial properties he owns, chiefly his Mar-a-Lago resort. Forty-three percent see this as a conflict of interest because it promotes those properties, but 54 percent say it's not a conflict because he has the right to go where he wants.

The 100-day point has been used as a benchmark since Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration, but, like any such time stamp, it has questionable predictive value. As noted, it usually marks the height of a president's honeymoon in public opinion. It's also situational. In available data, the highest rating at or near 100 days was Harry Truman's 87 percent in a Gallup poll when he took office after the Roosevelt's death; yet Truman's career average was 47 percent approval. The lowest at 100 days was Gerald Ford's 48 percent after he succeeded (and pardoned) Richard Nixon, yet Ford's career average was about the same as Truman's. Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush had 63 and 71 percent 100-day approval ratings –- yet neither won a second term.

Current politics, moreover, are marked by especially sharp partisanship, a central reason for Trump's comparatively poor rating. Seventy-nine percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents approve of his job performance; just 12 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents agree. Obama at 100 days did better in his base, with 93 percent approval from leaned Democrats, but also had 40 percent from leaned Republicans.

As mentioned, Trump's challenges don't mean the opposition is in good shape. In March 2014, 48 percent of Americans said the Democratic Party was out of touch with the concerns of most people. Today 67 percent say so. And the biggest change has occurred chiefly among the party's own typical loyalists, with "out of touch" ratings up 33 points among liberals, 30 points among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents and 26 points among moderates and nonwhites alike.

Vote again?

Among Americans who say they voted in the 2016 election, 46 percent say they voted for Hillary Clinton and 43 percent for Trump, very close to the 2-point margin in the actual popular vote results. However, while Trump would retain almost all of his support if the election were held again today (96 percent), fewer of Clinton's supporters say they’d stick with her (85 percent), producing a 40-43 percent Clinton-Trump result in this hypothetical re-do among self-reported 2016 voters.

That's not because former Clinton supporters would now back Trump; only 2 percent of them say they'd do so, similar to the 1 percent of Trump voters who say they'd switch to Clinton. Instead, they're more apt to say they'd vote for a third-party candidate or wouldn’t vote.

In a cautionary note to her party, Clinton's 6-point drop in a hypothetical mulligan election relates to views of whether the Democratic Party is in touch with peoples' concerns. Although the sample sizes are small, those who say the party is out of touch are less likely to say they'd support Clinton again, compared with those who see it as in touch.

Still, there's no strong evidence that defectors primarily come from groups that favored Bernie Sanders in the primary. There are no broad differences by age, and liberals are 9 points more likely than moderates and conservatives to stick with Clinton. Similarly, nonwhites are 10 points more likely than whites to say they would not support Clinton again, with more than a third of them heading to the Libertarian candidate, Gary Johnson.

Approval groups

Trump's approval rating among groups differs in familiar patterns from the election. Fifty-four percent of whites approve of his job performance; just 19 percent of nonwhites (including 22 percent of Hispanics and 6 percent of blacks) agree. His approval rating is 15 points lower among the youngest adults compared with seniors. It's 67 percent among conservatives vs. 37 percent among moderates and 9 percent among liberals. And it's 73 percent among evangelical white Protestants, a GOP mainstay.

Trump's rating is 10 points higher among whites who lack a college degree than among those who have one. Indeed, again echoing the election, he reaches 65 percent approval among non-college white men, vs. 40 percent among college-educated white women.

The economys another factor; while it doesn’t guarantee presidential approval, a strong or improving economy at least makes it easier to achieve. Today 30 percent say the economy is improving, vs. 18 percent who say it’s getting worse, with a plurality, 49 percent, saying it’s staying the same. Among those who think it’s improving, 83 percent approve of Trump’s job performance, while among those who think it’s staying the same, just 29 percent approve, as do only 10 percent of those who say it’s getting worse.

Of course, the result likely is bi-directional – views of the economy color views of the president, but views of the president also influence views of the economy. Indeed, 62 percent of Republicans think the economy’s improving; just a quarter of independents and 12 percent of Democrats agree.

 There are notable differences among groups on other questions as well. One is a large age effect on whether or not Trump is in touch with people’s concerns – 71 percent of under 30s say not, as do 65 percent of those age 30 to 39, declining to 52 percent – still a majority – among those 40 .

Additionally, 62 percent of Democrats say Trump is not keeping his promises, while 77 percent of Republicans say he is keeping them. (Independents split evenly.) As with views of the future economy, that’s an example of motivated reasoning – sharply different assessments of the same object, informed by partisan predispositions. Whatever changes in the Trump administration, this phenomenon – typical of all politics – likely won’t.

Methodology

This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by landline and cellular telephone April 17-20, 2017, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 1,004 adults. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points, including the design effect. Partisan divisions are 31-24-36 percent, Democrats-Republicans-independents.

The survey was produced for ABC News by Langer Research Associates of New York, N.Y., with sampling, data collection and tabulation by Abt Associates of Cambridge, Massachusetts. See details on the survey’s methodology here.

See the full results here.

Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

0
comments



Subscribe To This Feed

iStock/Thinkstock(WASHINGTON) -- Members of Congress will return to Washington next week to confront a government shutdown deadline and a White House eager to notch some legislative victories, especially on health care.

The most pressing business is government funding: The House and Senate have until midnight Friday to cut a trillion-dollar spending deal to prevent a partial government shutdown on President Trump's 100th day in office.

While bipartisan negotiations continue on Capitol Hill, Trump is driving a hard bargain, insisting on money to begin construction on a border wall and boost defense spending.

Democrats insist they won't support a downpayment on the Southwest border wall, and are pushing back against Trump's threat of stopping key federal subsidy payments to health insurers under Obamacare.

Sources close to negotiations expect Congress to pass a short-term funding measure -– anywhere between one and three weeks -- to give appropriators more time to finalize a larger spending deal to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September.

Beyond keeping the government's lights on, Republicans, encouraged by the White House, are still hoping to revive the GOP health care bill that was pulled from the House floor roughly a month ago.

Moderate Rep. Tom MacArthur, R-New Jersey, has floated a proposed amendment that would give states the ability to request to opt out of certain Obamacare regulations while making essential health benefits –- the requirement that all plans cover things like prescription drugs and mental health services -– the federal standard.

Members are waiting to review legislative text for the proposal, and a vote could come midweek after members return to Washington on Tuesday.

Despite pressure from the White House to put points on the board ahead of Trump's 100th day in office, it's not clear that the underlying political dynamics that sank the health care bill initially have changed, and that the amended version could garner 216 votes on the House floor.

In a conference call with members Saturday, House Speaker Paul Ryan said legislative language for the MacArthur amendment is being finalized, according to a GOP source on the call.

He made clear that there will be a vote only when it's clear the bill has enough support, and that votes will drive the timing, according to the source.

Additionally, Trump has said that starting "next week" he will be unveiling his tax reform package with "massive" tax cuts for all Americans.

"It really formally begins on Wednesday," he told reporters on Friday.

House Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady said in a statement that his committee is "ready to work" with the White House, although it's not clear what exactly will materialize next week.

The White House and Republicans also have their sights on the Dodd-Frank Act signed by President Obama following the 2008 financial crisis. The House Financial Services Committee is holding a hearing this week on a GOP replacement to the law.

Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

0
comments



Subscribe To This Feed

ABC News(NEW YORK) -- California's top law enforcement officer said his state is "ready" to confront the Trump administration over its funding threats against so-called sanctuary cities.

State Attorney General Xavier Becerra responded in an interview on ABC's This Week Sunday to warnings by the Trump administration that it could cut funding to sanctuary cities, which are places that limit how much local police forces can cooperate with federal immigration authorities.

Becerra contrasted the role of the federal government with California’s law enforcement agencies.

"We fully respect that they have the responsibility to enforce immigration law," he told ABC News Chief Anchor George Stephanopoulos. "We are in the business of public safety. We're not in the business of deportation."

He said California abides by federal laws on immigration and asserted that the U.S. government cannot order state or local jurisdictions to change their approach to public safety.

"We're going to continue to abide by federal law and the U.S. Constitution,” Becerra said. “And we're hoping the federal government will also abide by the U.S. Constitution, which gives my state the right to decide how to do public safety.”

The Trump administration on Friday sent letters to officials in California and major cities including New York, Chicago, Philadelphia and New Orleans, warning them that they may lose coveted law-enforcement grant money unless they document cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

Stephanopoulos asked Becerra about Sessions' remarks in an earlier This Week interview Sunday. "You heard him. He's saying, especially in California, you're not fulfilling that duty" of cooperation, Stephanopoulos said.

"We can prove anywhere we need to ... that we are protecting our people," Becerra responded. "And we're doing it by keeping families together, not separating them." Stephanopoulos also asked the attorney general about the apparently confusing messages from the Trump administration on the status of DREAMers, unauthorized immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children and who are currently protected from deportation by orders signed by former President Obama.

Trump on Friday said DREAMers should "rest easy," but Sessions said on "This Week" that they, like all unauthorized immigrants, are "subject to being deported."

 "It's not clear what we can trust, what statement we can believe in" regarding DREAMers, Becerra said. "And that causes a great deal of not just anxiety, but confusion, not just for those immigrant families, but for our law enforcement personnel."

"I've been trying to reach out to Attorney General Sessions and to [Department of Homeland Security] Secretary Kelly, to get a sense of really what is their policy when it comes to the DREAMers," the California attorney general said. "We'd like to know, is it in fact a policy of this president and this administration and this Attorney General Sessions to abide by the ... policy that allows DREAMers to continue to go to school, to go to work, to believe that they're not going to be out there and be apprehended by [immigration] agents simply because they look like people who weren't born here?"

Copyright © 2017, ABC Radio. All rights reserved.

0
comments



Hurricane Warnings

Click here for severe weather information.


SnoCountry

Weather

 


On Facebook


LinkedUpRadio Envisionwise Web Services